Grim Truth 93/17/01
Jan. 17th, 2010 04:08 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Greetings, British Wizarding World.
Things have been moving quickly of late - so much so that I could likely write to you every day. But then if I did, I hate to think what retributions might occur, whether 'in my name' or despite it.
Still, there are some items that bear attention, and demand response. Back at the beginning of last year, and then again in June, we talked about the debate over whether the Head Boy and Girl ought to be allowed to use the Unforgivable curse known as the Cruciatus. At the time, I wondered if teenagers had really become so much more unruly in the present generation that torture was the only way to control them.
However, it seems that the Grim Truth of the matter is even more insidious: Apparently the youth of Hogwarts no longer need to do anything wrong to earn punishment in extremis. Anyone with children at Hogwarts or soon to begin attendance should be righteously afraid for them, if they were not already. Especially now that they have been locked into quarantine by Ministry edict!
There were two incidents this week alone, neither of them provoked or deserved. I have seen some comments to the effect that the second student invited the curse, for academic interest, and therefore the occurrence is of no concern. I could not agree more with those who counter that an underage witch cannot be expected to give informed consent to be tortured. Although the witch in question has my respect and kudos for the way she bore the curse, she should never have been allowed to subject herself to it. I am sure her father wishes she could have gone through her whole life without ever experiencing the torment of an Unforgivable Curse. (As do we all.)
Some of the students have been braver than others at expressing their outrage – and their fear that they may be next. Even the Hogwarts Board of Governors have questioned the wisdom of allowing the Curse when it can be applied to callously and for so little reason as has been exhibited this week. Perhaps the least of these messages is the one that reminds us the journals are not to be trusted, for they are tools the Ministry intends to use against you as they monitor your thoughts and statements, much the way Amycus Carrow held a theoretical discussion against the student he tortured Thursday night.
This incident, and others like it, demonstrates more clearly than I can say how abhorrent the use of the Unforgivable Curses ought to be, and how there can be no safe haven for Hogwarts’ students while those in charge take it upon themselves to punish the people in their care so brutally. What justification can possibly serve? How can anyone of conscience allow such a miscarriage of duty? One can only hope that yesterday's emergent Board meeting will lead to a more sensible attitude toward the Curse. (It is especially intriguing to note Lucius Malfoy's shock over the use of the Curse, considering he had no such scruples when it was applied to his own goddaughter about a year ago - and by none other than my benighted mother!) I admit that I'm heartily curious as to the outcome and the particulars of their discussion!
At the same time, Hogwarts has now become a quarantine state, at the very time that its students are more concerned than ever that they'll be attacked by one type of madman or another. We now see that the Ministry cover-up of the epidemic has led to its spread far beyond the confines of the camps. Supposedly, the Ministry claims that half bloods are 'more vulnerable' to the ravages of disease. However, is should be clear that this affliction, whatever its origin, recognises no barriers of blood. It is working its way through the whole population, not just those with no magic. This fact alone ought to remind everyone that there is no difference between purebloods, halfbloods, Muggle-borns, and Muggles. All are human. I don't know what makes wizardkind able to perform magic. Is it a genetic trait? Is it something more mystical? I'm no biologist. But I do know that our abilities do not give us the right to style ourselves more worthy than those without the talent.
It's that distinction that I suspect may be the downfall of St Mungo's efforts to discover a cure for the Scourge - or paralysis, if you prefer. I shouldn't be surprised if they started, or were ordered to start, from the assumption that the camp epidemics could not touch the magical population. It's clear you're all at risk.
That assumes that the Ministry are (finally) telling you the Grim Truth themselves, and not obstructing your right to travel out of some authoritarian desire. One thing they have not told you is that no matter what, there is still hope. You owe it to yourselves to take precautions, but in addition to demand that the Ministry bring all its resources to bear, to make no assumptions about what may be causing this disease or how to resolve it. And you owe it to yourselves to keep questioning what you hear, to keep your eyes and ears open and to continue to speak when you can - and when you must.
Things have been moving quickly of late - so much so that I could likely write to you every day. But then if I did, I hate to think what retributions might occur, whether 'in my name' or despite it.
Still, there are some items that bear attention, and demand response. Back at the beginning of last year, and then again in June, we talked about the debate over whether the Head Boy and Girl ought to be allowed to use the Unforgivable curse known as the Cruciatus. At the time, I wondered if teenagers had really become so much more unruly in the present generation that torture was the only way to control them.
However, it seems that the Grim Truth of the matter is even more insidious: Apparently the youth of Hogwarts no longer need to do anything wrong to earn punishment in extremis. Anyone with children at Hogwarts or soon to begin attendance should be righteously afraid for them, if they were not already. Especially now that they have been locked into quarantine by Ministry edict!
There were two incidents this week alone, neither of them provoked or deserved. I have seen some comments to the effect that the second student invited the curse, for academic interest, and therefore the occurrence is of no concern. I could not agree more with those who counter that an underage witch cannot be expected to give informed consent to be tortured. Although the witch in question has my respect and kudos for the way she bore the curse, she should never have been allowed to subject herself to it. I am sure her father wishes she could have gone through her whole life without ever experiencing the torment of an Unforgivable Curse. (As do we all.)
Some of the students have been braver than others at expressing their outrage – and their fear that they may be next. Even the Hogwarts Board of Governors have questioned the wisdom of allowing the Curse when it can be applied to callously and for so little reason as has been exhibited this week. Perhaps the least of these messages is the one that reminds us the journals are not to be trusted, for they are tools the Ministry intends to use against you as they monitor your thoughts and statements, much the way Amycus Carrow held a theoretical discussion against the student he tortured Thursday night.
This incident, and others like it, demonstrates more clearly than I can say how abhorrent the use of the Unforgivable Curses ought to be, and how there can be no safe haven for Hogwarts’ students while those in charge take it upon themselves to punish the people in their care so brutally. What justification can possibly serve? How can anyone of conscience allow such a miscarriage of duty? One can only hope that yesterday's emergent Board meeting will lead to a more sensible attitude toward the Curse. (It is especially intriguing to note Lucius Malfoy's shock over the use of the Curse, considering he had no such scruples when it was applied to his own goddaughter about a year ago - and by none other than my benighted mother!) I admit that I'm heartily curious as to the outcome and the particulars of their discussion!
At the same time, Hogwarts has now become a quarantine state, at the very time that its students are more concerned than ever that they'll be attacked by one type of madman or another. We now see that the Ministry cover-up of the epidemic has led to its spread far beyond the confines of the camps. Supposedly, the Ministry claims that half bloods are 'more vulnerable' to the ravages of disease. However, is should be clear that this affliction, whatever its origin, recognises no barriers of blood. It is working its way through the whole population, not just those with no magic. This fact alone ought to remind everyone that there is no difference between purebloods, halfbloods, Muggle-borns, and Muggles. All are human. I don't know what makes wizardkind able to perform magic. Is it a genetic trait? Is it something more mystical? I'm no biologist. But I do know that our abilities do not give us the right to style ourselves more worthy than those without the talent.
It's that distinction that I suspect may be the downfall of St Mungo's efforts to discover a cure for the Scourge - or paralysis, if you prefer. I shouldn't be surprised if they started, or were ordered to start, from the assumption that the camp epidemics could not touch the magical population. It's clear you're all at risk.
That assumes that the Ministry are (finally) telling you the Grim Truth themselves, and not obstructing your right to travel out of some authoritarian desire. One thing they have not told you is that no matter what, there is still hope. You owe it to yourselves to take precautions, but in addition to demand that the Ministry bring all its resources to bear, to make no assumptions about what may be causing this disease or how to resolve it. And you owe it to yourselves to keep questioning what you hear, to keep your eyes and ears open and to continue to speak when you can - and when you must.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-18 01:15 am (UTC)How thoughtful of you.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-18 06:40 am (UTC)Besides, you know how I like to hear from you.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-18 02:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-18 11:49 pm (UTC)Which is really no different from when we were kids, after all.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-19 02:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-19 02:46 am (UTC)That and other things.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-19 02:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-19 03:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-19 03:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-19 04:03 am (UTC)All I said was that you'll get your 'assignment' or whatever you choose to call it, it'll get reported as something to do with my vast array of followers and all the papers will call for my head - again.
I do wonder, though - don't you get tired of not being able to take credit where it's due?
no subject
Date: 2010-01-19 03:56 pm (UTC)I used to wonder how things would have been different if I'd been oldest. Whether you'd have come out differently; whether I would. Whether you'd have seen me differently. Or the reverse.
Does the difference between us really come down to wanting 'credit'? To masses of people speaking your name? To publicity? and your face grinning out from wanted bills on every light post and shop window?
I work to bring credit to our name and receive credit from the only source that matters. The only source that's ever extended it, really.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-19 09:15 pm (UTC)In my view, the difference between us is that you've always craved approval and recognition, from one sort of authority figure or another. And you've done whatever you think will buy you that praise. Whereas I learned I don't need a pat on the head to find acceptance or feel like I'm part of something greater than myself. I'd just as soon not be the one under the fairylights, to be honest, but I'm not going to stand by silently if no one else has the brass to call foul.
Would it have been easier for us if you'd been older? Does it matter?
no subject
Date: 2010-01-19 09:33 pm (UTC)You know, they say that sometimes a person on his deathbed will fancy himself somewhere else entirely, fully believing himself hale and whole even as he draws his last breath.
I Solemnly Swear That I Am Up To No Good
Date: 2010-01-18 02:36 am (UTC)I think he's right thought that purebloods will get it next. Though I wonder why the camp guards didn't all get sick? I mean this started in the muggle camps. Maybe it's that they're healthier? One of the years I didn't have enough to eat, I got really sick, and I think the muggles in the camps often don't have enough to eat.
Although the Strettons feed their muggles pretty well and their muggles were REALLY sick.
Re: I Solemnly Swear That I Am Up To No Good
Date: 2010-01-18 03:40 am (UTC)Re: I Solemnly Swear That I Am Up To No Good
Date: 2010-01-18 03:53 am (UTC)Mr and Mrs Stretton never left the house the whole of Christmas hols. They hire a bunch of managers anyway, they had the managers out dealing with the muggles and reporting in by owl or maybe floo but they weren't ever allowed to come in to the house.
I expect before they quarantined themselves they used bubblehead charms and scourgify and the rest.
Re: I Solemnly Swear That I Am Up To No Good
Date: 2010-01-18 02:38 pm (UTC)Anywiz, I bet the camp bosses just stay in their offices all the time and hardly ever get close to any but a few of the muggles.
Re: I Solemnly Swear That I Am Up To No Good
Date: 2010-01-18 03:56 am (UTC)Don't tell anyone as I think it was written by a muggle and your mum did say to be careful with it. But if any of you want to read it you can. I'm loaning it to Pansy first though.
Re: I Solemnly Swear That I Am Up To No Good
Date: 2010-01-18 04:34 am (UTC)I'll be careful not to let Seamus or Dean see it. Seamus probably wouldn't even notice, I reckon, but don't know about Dean. Who knows what he might tell his foster father.
Re: I Solemnly Swear That I Am Up To No Good
Date: 2010-01-18 02:39 pm (UTC)I mean, I've enough stuff to read just for homework and all.
Re: I Solemnly Swear That I Am Up To No Good
Date: 2010-01-18 10:22 pm (UTC)Re: I Solemnly Swear That I Am Up To No Good
Date: 2010-01-18 11:17 pm (UTC)I mean, it could be a totally naff, girlie muggle story or it could be something really wizard, couldn't it?
Re: I Solemnly Swear That I Am Up To No Good
Date: 2010-01-19 01:21 am (UTC)It's THREE PAGES LONG. NeverMIND already I'd probably just have to explain it to you after you read it anyway.
Re: I Solemnly Swear That I Am Up To No Good
Date: 2010-01-19 02:24 am (UTC)So I guess I am curious, yeah?
Re: I Solemnly Swear That I Am Up To No Good
Date: 2010-01-19 02:41 am (UTC)Re: I Solemnly Swear That I Am Up To No Good
Date: 2010-01-19 02:55 am (UTC)The twins have got a charm that makes a parchment look like homework if anyone looks at it who doesn't know the password. We got them to put it on the story. Now it looks like Astronomy when I hold it and like Herbology when Nev's holding it. It'll probably be Potions for you.
Oh, yeah. The password's the usual one. Y'know. I Solemnly Swear. Just so y'know.
Re: I Solemnly Swear That I Am Up To No Good
Date: 2010-01-19 03:01 am (UTC)It sounds like a nift spell so long as Fred and George can change the password. Pansy isn't stupid. It's not super likely she'd just randomly try casting it on her diary but she could.
Re: I Solemnly Swear That I Am Up To No Good
Date: 2010-01-19 03:17 am (UTC)Now it's tunafish.
Re: I Solemnly Swear That I Am Up To No Good
Date: 2010-01-19 03:24 am (UTC)Re: I Solemnly Swear That I Am Up To No Good
Date: 2010-01-18 04:30 am (UTC)I told you my Gran and Great Aunt and Evelyn used to go serve at the soup kitchen every couple of weeks at Wyre. Evelyn's written to me about it and said Gran was always a fanatic about washing hands and using scourgify and so on every time they went, because Gran always told her it would be easy to pick up any diseases the muggles and muggleborns might have.
Re: I Solemnly Swear That I Am Up To No Good
Date: 2010-01-18 04:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-18 04:18 am (UTC)Luna Lovegood
It would of course, be preferable
For you to presume to judge the motivations
The Ministry
That the curses used to be called 'Unforgiveable'
I'm sure that the Ministry appreciates your concern for its citizens.
Yes, I'm being sarcastic.
Order Only
Date: 2010-01-18 04:42 am (UTC)He argued against the proposition that the Head Boy and Head Girl be given authority to issue the curse in the first place, remember, and you know, of course, about that whole blow up we had this summer when he experimented with using it himself against a garden gnome.
Molly received a letter from him today. He was deeply upset about what happened to Luna.
Re: Order Only
Date: 2010-01-18 06:59 am (UTC)Still, he does seem to have a good heart, your boy. I've been paying attention to what he has to contribute - and when and how he says it. It certainly seems as if he mostly wants everyone to get on without any major trouble. But then, there are plenty of good people caught up in this government of yours, who are able somehow to suppress their better judgement in order to do what they do every day, in the interest of 'getting on'.
I dunno. If he truly wants success - I mean position, power, etc. - sooner or later he's going to have to choose what he can and can't ignore. And I know, that's what scares you and Molly.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-18 06:44 am (UTC)And no, the sad thing is I'm not being sarcastic at all. See if you can count up the days until something nasty happens and I get the 'credit' for it.
Remember your question to me last spring?
no subject
Date: 2010-01-18 10:28 pm (UTC)The deliberations of the Ministry, St Mungo's, the Hogwarts' Board of Governors and any other institution to which you may think you have the right of disclosure are, naturally, no business of a pariah who has cast himself ever in the rôle of martyr and self-appointed saviour. Your disciples may believe your messianic drivel, but to the true citizen of the Protectorate it is clear that you have not a shred of evidence for your claims.
You only wish to cause alarm where there is no call. Just as you only wish to incite discord in the minds of those too weak to see your deceptions for what they are. Moreover, to continually involve students in your melodramatic pronouncements of doom is an act of the worst cowardice. It is they, and not you, who will pay the price if they are so naïve as to give you the slightest credence.
I Solemnly Swear That I Am Up To No Good
Date: 2010-01-19 01:23 am (UTC)She wishes she could but she knows she'd only get in trouble for it.