I keep running over and over all the possibilities I can conjure. I would be the logical one to take the boy, if we were to attempt it. I would be immediately suspected if he were to disappear, of course, so I might as well be the one to take him away.
But Carrow's privilege with the Protector is such that the bloodhounds would surely be loosed and the pursuit would be hot. In the old days London was a place one could disappear, but today? Am I mistaken, Remus? There aren't enough people now to allow for one (let alone two) to hide in plain sight.
And I can think of nothing so likely to set in motion the chain of events by which the protections on the Sanctuary might ultimately be penetrated as if I were to take Amycus Carrow's servant there. Unless something alters his standing with You Know Who, I fear we cannot risk turning all of the resources and powers of that very One on our most important treasure.
Honestly, Remus, the only solution I see is one I'm not yet able to reconcile with my conscience, though if I thought I could be certain of success, I'm not sure I could help but try it.
Re: ORDER ONLY
But Carrow's privilege with the Protector is such that the bloodhounds would surely be loosed and the pursuit would be hot. In the old days London was a place one could disappear, but today? Am I mistaken, Remus? There aren't enough people now to allow for one (let alone two) to hide in plain sight.
And I can think of nothing so likely to set in motion the chain of events by which the protections on the Sanctuary might ultimately be penetrated as if I were to take Amycus Carrow's servant there. Unless something alters his standing with You Know Who, I fear we cannot risk turning all of the resources and powers of that very One on our most important treasure.
Honestly, Remus, the only solution I see is one I'm not yet able to reconcile with my conscience, though if I thought I could be certain of success, I'm not sure I could help but try it.