Grim Truth 92/17/10
Oct. 17th, 2009 02:15 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Greetings, British Wizarding World!
Like many of you, I’ve been reading with interest the discussions among Hogwarts students (and parents) who bemoan the state of their education and have determined to take their future into their own hands.
I think any of us who have passed through Hogwarts’ halls in the past several generations can attest that there have always been unpopular subjects and professors. It’s the prerogative of all students to grumble about their schoolwork.
I am forced to agree that there are significant problems with the current slate of faculty, as well as the quality of certain subjects as they are being taught. In all fairness to the Headmistress, some of the deficiencies have been inherited, and some doubtless forced upon the school — and whether that can end anything other than badly is yet to be seen. Were I a parent with children at Hogwarts, I should be alarmed and worried not only for their educations, but their safety — as the events of this week show with painful clarity.
But the less said about Amycus Coward the better. It’s on something a little less drastic that I write currently. I’m pleased to see that Hogwarts’ students remain as resourceful as ever, providing their own solutions to the limitations of their tutelage. But where those solutions touch on our history, our social order or our race relations, the new lessons bear particularly careful examination.
A wise man once said, ‘those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.’ It seems to me that the problem facing all British wizardom right now is its willingness to ignore history. Perhaps even more disturbing are the revisions to history taking place with governmental encouragement, and our children’s willingness to absorb as much of this alternative history as they can amass.
We all remember our past experiences differently. Recent conversations I’ve had have made that fact abundantly clear. But when we deliberately revise history, we actively alter our perceptions of the past, our role in the present and our options for the future.
Take History of Magic, for example. While it may be difficult to focus on the lessons of a teacher who, let’s face it, wasn’t that engaging while alive, and is even less inclined to be dynamic or exciting now that he is vapourous, it is nonetheless important to remember that there is another reason the so-called ‘Council’ object to his teaching. That reason is that his version of history predates the lies and propaganda that the Ministry wishes to force upon the whole population. They would have your young people classify his teaching as merely an annoyance to be endured, learned by rote, spit back for the purpose of exams, and set aside in favour of the ‘definitive’ new timelines. But these are in themselves nothing more than alterations of the facts. And Professor Binns, if nothing else, has always prided himself on his reverence for facts.
Now, let’s not take that argument too far. History itself is a flawed and evolving picture, too often written only by the winners. Benjamin Disraeli said, ‘Read no history: nothing but biography, for that is history without theory.’ What he meant was that every historian brings his own perspective to the story he tells. How does one evaluate the stories one hears, separate the appeal of the poetic from indifference to the mundane, read between the lines to guess at what is not being told?
Statistics and facts can be manipulated. Theories can be spun from nearly any angle to support nearly any hypothesis. Even photographs and interviews may be staged so that they become as much theatrical exercise as a Christmas concert. The single best method to distill the past is, simply, to examine it from more than a single point of view. No one person is the sole arbiter of the Grim Truth: only collectively, taking all perspectives into account, can we fully understand and decide what is best to believe.
In conclusion, parents of Hogwarts: Think twice before you tell your children to discount their History of Magic lessons – or the older ‘arcane’ texts available in the library. Remember how it was before you each became an agent, willing or unwilling, of oppression and subjugation. (Here’s an exercise for you: This holiday, drag out your old books from your attics and cupboards and compare them to your children’s. Just how different are they?) And students: Think twice about what your textbooks tell you, especially in History, Muggle Studies and even Defence Against the Dark Arts. Anything written within your lifetimes is subject to revisionism on the scale of the most infamous governments in, well, in history. Consider not only the point of view of the winners, but the losers. And never, never accept what you are told just because you are told it is so.
Like many of you, I’ve been reading with interest the discussions among Hogwarts students (and parents) who bemoan the state of their education and have determined to take their future into their own hands.
I think any of us who have passed through Hogwarts’ halls in the past several generations can attest that there have always been unpopular subjects and professors. It’s the prerogative of all students to grumble about their schoolwork.
I am forced to agree that there are significant problems with the current slate of faculty, as well as the quality of certain subjects as they are being taught. In all fairness to the Headmistress, some of the deficiencies have been inherited, and some doubtless forced upon the school — and whether that can end anything other than badly is yet to be seen. Were I a parent with children at Hogwarts, I should be alarmed and worried not only for their educations, but their safety — as the events of this week show with painful clarity.
But the less said about Amycus Coward the better. It’s on something a little less drastic that I write currently. I’m pleased to see that Hogwarts’ students remain as resourceful as ever, providing their own solutions to the limitations of their tutelage. But where those solutions touch on our history, our social order or our race relations, the new lessons bear particularly careful examination.
A wise man once said, ‘those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.’ It seems to me that the problem facing all British wizardom right now is its willingness to ignore history. Perhaps even more disturbing are the revisions to history taking place with governmental encouragement, and our children’s willingness to absorb as much of this alternative history as they can amass.
We all remember our past experiences differently. Recent conversations I’ve had have made that fact abundantly clear. But when we deliberately revise history, we actively alter our perceptions of the past, our role in the present and our options for the future.
Take History of Magic, for example. While it may be difficult to focus on the lessons of a teacher who, let’s face it, wasn’t that engaging while alive, and is even less inclined to be dynamic or exciting now that he is vapourous, it is nonetheless important to remember that there is another reason the so-called ‘Council’ object to his teaching. That reason is that his version of history predates the lies and propaganda that the Ministry wishes to force upon the whole population. They would have your young people classify his teaching as merely an annoyance to be endured, learned by rote, spit back for the purpose of exams, and set aside in favour of the ‘definitive’ new timelines. But these are in themselves nothing more than alterations of the facts. And Professor Binns, if nothing else, has always prided himself on his reverence for facts.
Now, let’s not take that argument too far. History itself is a flawed and evolving picture, too often written only by the winners. Benjamin Disraeli said, ‘Read no history: nothing but biography, for that is history without theory.’ What he meant was that every historian brings his own perspective to the story he tells. How does one evaluate the stories one hears, separate the appeal of the poetic from indifference to the mundane, read between the lines to guess at what is not being told?
Statistics and facts can be manipulated. Theories can be spun from nearly any angle to support nearly any hypothesis. Even photographs and interviews may be staged so that they become as much theatrical exercise as a Christmas concert. The single best method to distill the past is, simply, to examine it from more than a single point of view. No one person is the sole arbiter of the Grim Truth: only collectively, taking all perspectives into account, can we fully understand and decide what is best to believe.
In conclusion, parents of Hogwarts: Think twice before you tell your children to discount their History of Magic lessons – or the older ‘arcane’ texts available in the library. Remember how it was before you each became an agent, willing or unwilling, of oppression and subjugation. (Here’s an exercise for you: This holiday, drag out your old books from your attics and cupboards and compare them to your children’s. Just how different are they?) And students: Think twice about what your textbooks tell you, especially in History, Muggle Studies and even Defence Against the Dark Arts. Anything written within your lifetimes is subject to revisionism on the scale of the most infamous governments in, well, in history. Consider not only the point of view of the winners, but the losers. And never, never accept what you are told just because you are told it is so.
Order Only
Date: 2009-10-17 06:44 pm (UTC)Anyway, I didn't want to harp on Carrow too much, for fear it would influence the Governors to maintain him just to be contrary.
Sorry, Minerva, but I did try to emphasize that Hogwarts is no longer under your sole authority and that you're not entirely responsible for the problems you face. Still, by all means, jump in and defend yourself - and excoriate me in the process!
no subject
Date: 2009-10-17 07:29 pm (UTC)Don't listen to the scold, Justine. Break its quill, cut off its hands, silence its tongue. Sharpen the blade and reap the harvest of blood.
I wonder, will your blood still run pure, after so many years of taint? Rivulets of tarnished blood, still red, still red my lovely
I'll certainly relish finding out
Order Only
Date: 2009-10-17 08:06 pm (UTC)Could it be something I said?
(I only hope he doesn't lash out at Terry while he's so brassed off with me.)
Re: Order Only
Date: 2009-10-17 09:32 pm (UTC)Re: Order Only
Date: 2009-10-17 09:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-19 01:46 pm (UTC)Nonetheless, rail all you like, Black. Write every week, if you wish. You shall soon find that Our Lord has no rival in matters of due justice. For every invasion into our peace, He shall see to it that you regret your decision. If you cannot be silenced, you can be turned into your own worst weapon against the very kine you would incite to action.
What will you do, I wonder, when the mere mention of your name inspires fear of reprisal? When the appearance of one of these towers of lies results in a widespread clamour to rid innocents of the scourge of your words? When you see what your arrogance brings?
When will you realise that the more you seek glory as a bold hero, brave enough to speak your misguided version of 'truth,' the more you instead establish yourself as a conceited profligate, deriving satisfaction only from the sound of your own discord?
You are nothing, Black. Nothing but a tool Our Lord can put to use in His own way. The sooner you understand that, the sooner you will cease your infernal disruptions.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-19 03:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-19 03:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-19 03:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-19 03:42 pm (UTC)Still, direct and indirect results are very different things. If the Death Eaters take it into their heads to hurt an innocent bystander because they can't reach me directly, that's regrettable and extremely distasteful. But it's not my wand casting the curse, nor my intent that causes them harm.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-19 03:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-19 03:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-19 03:26 pm (UTC)Wish that was true. But not always, I don't think.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-19 03:31 pm (UTC)However, in this particular struggle, we must hope the truth reaches us all rather sooner, if we have any hope of repairing the damage that has been done so far.
Order Only
Date: 2009-10-19 03:42 pm (UTC)Re: Order Only
Date: 2009-10-19 03:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-19 03:39 pm (UTC)This is not a person with whom one speaks. Better not to read the things he writes at all.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-19 03:46 pm (UTC)(Why, though?)
no subject
Date: 2009-10-19 03:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-19 03:46 pm (UTC)Still, Lovegood, it's one thing to tell him off and it's quite another to actually think about what he has to say!
no subject
Date: 2009-10-19 03:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-19 04:57 pm (UTC)Although Sandoval says we oughnlt even do that, and just ignore him. I only stopped to look because I saw Mr Malfoy had written, and it's worth seeing what Mr Malfoy says.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-19 04:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-19 03:51 pm (UTC)Miss Lovegood, I'm far too dangerous. Best learn to speak in code and keep your private doubts tucked deep in your robe pockets.
After all, if you thought too closely about what I write, then soon everyone might be talking about equality and social responsibility, and then where would the rich and powerful be?
no subject
Date: 2009-10-19 04:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-19 04:48 pm (UTC)Too many adults or would-be adults, such as yourself, are far too zealous to reach. I'm living proof that prejudice is taught, Miss Sandoval, not inherent, and can be unlearned with a little effort. You stand as an example of one who has dedicated herself to the lessons, without considering their true meaning.
My allies grow every time the scales drop from another person's eyes.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-19 05:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-19 06:21 pm (UTC)On the other hand, statements from your government ought to be subject to the same scrutiny you level at my posts.
As for what I wish to subvert, you're not quite on the Galleon; I have every wish for the prosperity and health of all the people in the realm. It's simply that Voldemort and I have different definitions of who counts as people. It's not acceptable that some are considered human and others treated no better - or even worse - than animals.
Do you know who William Wallace was? There's an old ballad that quotes his supposed phrase: 'How am I a traitor when England is foreign to me?' I may be a proud Englishman and no Scot, Miss Sandoval, but your precious Protectorate is as foreign to me, and as anethema, as the oppression of Edward Longshanks was to the Wallace.
Order Only
Date: 2009-10-19 07:02 pm (UTC)Re: Order Only
Date: 2009-10-19 07:51 pm (UTC)Ideas are insidious creatures. That's why he's so afraid of them, after all. Once you get an idea in someone's head, it's deuced hard to get it back out.
Of course, that's the same problem I'm facing in reverse! Oh, well. One step at a time.
Your boy got scared off quickly enough, when I mentioned indirect consequences. Perhaps it's a good sign that his experiment over the summer hasn't left him completely unaffected?
Re: Order Only
Date: 2009-10-19 08:36 pm (UTC)His letters home have mentioned the Head Girl. He has a grudging admiration for her energy and ambition, but he does not like her. I get the impression, from what he says, that most of the students are more than a little afraid of her. He apparently crosses wands with her in almost every other Prefect meeting, and I think that's mostly because he's one of the few who will. And he says ruefully that he doesn't win very often.
Re: Order Only
Date: 2009-10-20 01:38 am (UTC)Re: Order Only
Date: 2009-10-20 03:05 am (UTC)